All model metrics

Search, sort, and compare reference board models in the selected size class (direct vendor APIs).

How to read scores

Each number is a 0–100 checklist composite from our lab battery — not a real-world accuracy percentage or a user preference ranking.

85+ Strong on the tested checklist
65–84 Solid, with room to improve
<65 Early or mixed results — common on strict v1 gates

Compile means the model passed engine routing gates for deployment — not a product endorsement. Full methodology

Reference board Together Catalog

Fast models: one curated pick per major direct API vendor (OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Google Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek).

Size class

Sort by

Direction

Clear search

Wide table — scroll sideways on desktop, or view as cards on mobile.

Identity

Capability

Safety

Performance

Status

Model

Vendor

Deploy

Accuracy

Reasoning

Coding

Slop

Reliability

Cap. safety

Jailbreak

PII

Bias

Latency

Cost

Stability

Badges

gemini-2.5-flash

Google

43.4%

48.3%

76.7%

80%

83.3%

100%

8.6%

50%

100%

Below compile bar Blocked

Model key: gemini-2.5-flash

Model ID: gemini-2.5-flash

Size band: le8b

Provenance: provider_standard

Capability pack: bench-pack-v2

Safety pack: bench-pack-safety-v2

Latency P95: 9142.4 ms

Throughput P50: 13.8 tps

Cost / task: $0.000047

Strengths

std.coding (good)
std.json_structured (best)
std.multiturn (best)
std.safety_policy (good)
std.slop.hallucination (best)
std.slop.relevance (good)
std.slop.topic_drift (best)
std.slop.uncertainty (best)
std.stability.refusal (best)
std.stability.repeat (best)
std.stability.schema (best)
std.summarization (best)
std.tool_use (best)

Standards

Standard	Composite	Tier	Easy	Medium	Hard	Easy-only cap
std.coding	76.7%	good	0	1	0.67	No
std.instruction_follow	0%	worst	—	—	—	No
std.json_structured	100%	best	1	1	1	No
std.long_context	25%	worst	—	—	—	No
std.math	16.7%	worst	0	0	0.67	No
std.multiturn	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.reasoning	0%	worst	0	0	0	No
std.safety_policy	83.3%	good	—	—	—	No
std.slop.contradiction	0%	worst	—	—	—	No
std.slop.format	0%	worst	—	—	—	No
std.slop.hallucination	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.slop.relevance	66.7%	good	—	—	—	No
std.slop.topic_drift	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.slop.uncertainty	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.stability.refusal	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.stability.repeat	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.stability.schema	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.summarization	85%	best	0	1	1	No
std.tool_use	100%	best	—	—	—	No
std.translation	0%	worst	—	—	—	No

Slop profiles

Standard	Violation %	Samples
std.slop.contradiction	100%	3
std.slop.format	100%	3
std.slop.hallucination	0%	3
std.slop.relevance	33.3%	3
std.slop.topic_drift	0%	3
std.slop.uncertainty	0%	3

Compile gates

G0 — status=complete
G1 — all required standards present
G2 — json_break=0/3
G3 — composite=1.000
G4 — safety_fn_rate=0
G5 — safety_fp_rate=0
G6 — latency_p95_ms=9142.399999999998 cap_ms=10000 size_band=le8b
G6b — throughput_p50_tps=13.77049180327869 floor_tps=20 size_band=le8b
G7 — g7_skipped_insufficient_comparables
G8 — provider_error_rate=0.000
G9 — no easy_only_cap

Safety gates

P0 — status=complete pack=bench-pack-safety-v2
P1 — all safety standards present
P6 — catalog_provenance=provider_standard
P2 — safety_fn_rate=0.08333333333333333
P3 — safety_fp_rate=0
P4 — jailbreak_resist_rate=1
P5 — harmful_output_rate=0.08333333333333333
P7 — pii_leak_rate=0
P8 — bias_report_only=true

Weakness tags

weakness:math_halluc (error_mode / ERR_HALLUCINATION)